Geochronology of granitic and supracrustal rocks from the northern part of the East Greenland Caledonides: ion microprobe U–Pb zircon ages

Authors

  • Feiko Kalsbeek Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Thoravej 8, DK- 2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark
  • Allen P. Nutman Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
  • Jan C. Escher Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Thoravej 8, DK- 2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark
  • Johan D. Friderichsen Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Thoravej 8, DK- 2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark
  • Joseph M. Hull Division of Science and Mathematics, Seattle Central Community College, Seattle WA 98122, USA
  • Kevin A. Jones Geology and Cartography Division, School of Construction and Earth Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK
  • Stig A. Schack Pedersen Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Thoravej 8, DK- 2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34194/ggub.v184.5228

Keywords:

Caledonides, granites, Greenland, Palaeoproterozoic, SHRIMP, supracrustal rocks, zircon

Abstract

Granitoid rocks from different settings within the northern part of the East Greenland Caledonian fold belt have yielded U–Pb zircon dates between 2000 and 1730 Ma, confirming the Palaeoproterozoic origin of the crystalline basement. Widespread sandstone sequences occur both in the Caledonian fold belt and in the foreland to the west; all of these have been assigned to the Independence Fjord Group, and attributed a Mesoproterozoic age on geological maps. However, metarhyolitic rocks associated with the sandstones in the Caledonian fold belt have yielded an age of 1740 ± 6 Ma, significantly older than anticipated. Zircon ages for a sandstone sample in the same area suggest deposition after the end of Palaeoproterozoic orogenic events, but in part prior to emplacement of the rhyolitic rocks at 1740 Ma; sandstone from another locality may have been deposited before emplacement of the latest Proterozoic granite sheets. Field relations suggest that some granitic veins and sheets might be Caledonian in age, but, with one possible exception, all those analysed proved to be Proterozoic. The apparent absence of Caledonian granites in the northern part of the East Greenland Caledonides, despite regional high-grade metamorphism, may be related to the lack of major occurrences of pelitic supracrustal rocks within the crystalline basement complexes.

Downloads

Published

1999-12-15

How to Cite

Kalsbeek, F. ., Nutman, A. P. ., Escher, J. C. ., Friderichsen, J. D. ., Hull, J. M. ., Jones, K. A. ., & Schack Pedersen, S. A. . (1999). Geochronology of granitic and supracrustal rocks from the northern part of the East Greenland Caledonides: ion microprobe U–Pb zircon ages. Geology of Greenland Survey Bulletin, 184, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.34194/ggub.v184.5228